The battle for political advantage in state capitols is poised to become more intense after the U.S. Supreme Court declared that federal judges have no role in settling disputes over partisan gerrymandering. It could shift legal challenges against partisan gerrymandering to state courts and prompt more efforts to reform redistricting procedures through amendments to state constitutions. Ultimately, it also could mean that voters upset with the party in power must seek change the old-fashioned way — by electing different lawmakers, no matter how difficult that might seem in heavily gerrymandered districts.
from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/2ZReCFl
from SEO Tech Tips https://ift.tt/2XeRvaN
Unknown
The battle for political advantage in state capitols is poised to become more intense after the U.S. Supreme Court declared that federal judges have no role in settling disputes over partisan gerrymandering. It could shift legal challenges against partisan gerrymandering to state courts and prompt more efforts to reform redistricting procedures through amendments to state constitutions. Ultimately, it also could mean that voters upset with the party in power must seek change the old-fashioned way — by electing different lawmakers, no matter how difficult that might seem in heavily gerrymandered districts.
from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/2ZReCFl
https://ift.tt/2FRyZe7 June 30, 2019 at 05:58AM https://ift.tt/2yfVyVV
No comments:
Post a Comment