The petitioners contend the judgment based on a hypothetical CAG report was not merely a “clerical or arithmetical slip” but a substantial error.
from The Hindu - Home https://ift.tt/2H0vcw6
Krishnadas Rajagopal https://ift.tt/eA8V8J February 26, 2019 at 06:20PM https://ift.tt/2IyLjhI
Tuesday, February 26, 2019
SC posts Rafale reviews for hearing in open court
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment